Ajinomoto vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics
Ajinomoto has a tracked market cap of $32.7B; Samsung Electro-Mechanics is currently unpriced in the dataset. Ajinomoto reports higher tracked revenue ($10.0B vs $8.0B). Both are primarily Substrates companies.
Shared segment: Materials.
Side-by-side
| Ajinomoto | Samsung Electro-Mechanics | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $32.7B | Unpriced |
| Revenue | $10.0B (FY2026) | $8.0B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Substrates | Substrates |
| Market position | monopoly | major |
| Country | Japan | South Korea |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 1 |
| Tracked customers | 13 | 9 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 99/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-08-12. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Ajinomoto and Samsung Electro-Mechanics compare
- Revenue: Ajinomoto reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Ajinomoto has the higher chokepoint score (99/100 vs 68/100).
- Footprint: Ajinomoto (Japan) vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics (South Korea).