Applied Materials vs Eugene Technology
Applied Materials is larger by market cap ($360.9B vs $2.3B). Applied Materials reports higher tracked revenue ($28.4B vs $256M). Both are primarily Deposition companies.
Shared segment: Equipment (Front End).
Side-by-side
| Applied Materials | Eugene Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $360.9B | $2.3B |
| Revenue | $28.4B (FY2025) | $256M (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Deposition | Deposition |
| Market position | leader | niche |
| Country | United States | South Korea |
| Tracked suppliers | 13 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 10 | 7 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 83/100 | 50/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-05. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Applied Materials and Eugene Technology compare
- Size: Applied Materials is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Applied Materials reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Applied Materials has the higher chokepoint score (83/100 vs 50/100).
- Footprint: Applied Materials (United States) vs Eugene Technology (South Korea).
Company hubs
Applied Materials · Eugene Technology · Equipment (Front End) segment
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Applied Materials vs Eugene Technology”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/applied_materials-vs-eugene_tech (data as of 2026-09-05).