Arteris vs Faraday Technology

Both are primarily Semiconductor IP Licensing companies. Faraday Technology is larger by market cap ($1.6B vs $1.1B). Faraday Technology reports higher tracked revenue ($566M vs $71M).

See all 32 EDA & IP companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

ArterisFaraday Technology
Market cap$1.1B$1.6B
Revenue$71M (FY2025)$566M (FY2025)
Primary segmentSemiconductor IP LicensingSemiconductor IP Licensing
Market positionnichemajor
CountryUnited StatesTaiwan
Tracked suppliers03
Tracked customers810
Chokepoint / criticality50/10068/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How Arteris and Faraday Technology compare

  • Size: Faraday Technology is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: Faraday Technology reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Faraday Technology has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 50/100).
  • Footprint: Arteris (United States) vs Faraday Technology (Taiwan).

Company hubs

Arteris · Faraday Technology · EDA & IP segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “Arteris vs Faraday Technology”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/arteris-vs-faraday (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is Arteris bigger than Faraday Technology?
Faraday Technology is larger by market cap ($1.6B vs $1.1B).
What's the difference between Arteris and Faraday Technology?
Arteris is a niche in Semiconductor IP Licensing based in United States; Faraday Technology is a major in Semiconductor IP Licensing based in Taiwan. Both operate in the EDA & IP segment.
Who are Arteris's and Faraday Technology's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for Arteris and 3 for Faraday Technology.