AT&S vs Kingboard Holdings
AT&S is larger by market cap ($7.2B vs $6.7B). Kingboard Holdings reports higher tracked revenue ($5.8B vs $2.1B). Both are primarily Substrates companies.
Shared segment: Materials.
Side-by-side
| AT&S | Kingboard Holdings | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $7.2B | $6.7B |
| Revenue | $2.1B (FY2026) | $5.8B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Substrates | Substrates |
| Market position | major | major |
| Country | Austria | Hong Kong |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 7 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-08-12. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How AT&S and Kingboard Holdings compare
- Size: AT&S is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Kingboard Holdings reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: AT&S has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 68/100).
- Footprint: AT&S (Austria) vs Kingboard Holdings (Hong Kong).