Chroma ATE vs Teradyne

Both are primarily Test Equipment companies. Teradyne is larger by market cap ($70.2B vs $29.2B). Teradyne reports higher tracked revenue ($3.2B vs $893M).

Shared segment: Equipment (Back End).

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

Chroma ATETeradyne
Market cap$29.2B$70.2B
Revenue$893M (FY2025)$3.2B (FY2025)
Primary segmentTest EquipmentTest Equipment
Market positionmajorleader
CountryTaiwanUnited States
Tracked suppliers60
Tracked customers910
Chokepoint / criticality68/10081/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-04. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How Chroma ATE and Teradyne compare

  • Size: Teradyne is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: Teradyne reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Teradyne has the higher chokepoint score (81/100 vs 68/100).
  • Footprint: Chroma ATE (Taiwan) vs Teradyne (United States).

Company hubs

Chroma ATE · Teradyne · Equipment (Back End) segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “Chroma ATE vs Teradyne”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/chroma-vs-teradyne (data as of 2026-10-04).

Frequently asked questions3
Is Chroma ATE bigger than Teradyne?
Teradyne is larger by market cap ($70.2B vs $29.2B).
What's the difference between Chroma ATE and Teradyne?
Chroma ATE is a major in Test Equipment based in Taiwan; Teradyne is a leader in Test Equipment based in United States. Both operate in the Equipment (Back End) segment.
Who are Chroma ATE's and Teradyne's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 6 suppliers for Chroma ATE and 0 for Teradyne — Chroma ATE's include Macnica Holdings, Weikeng Industrial, WT Microelectronics.