CoreWeave vs Oracle
CoreWeave's primary segment is GPU Clouds (Neoclouds); Oracle's is Hyperscalers. Oracle is larger by market cap ($431.4B vs $49.4B). Oracle reports higher tracked revenue ($67.4B vs $5.1B).
Shared segment: AI & Data Center.
Track the chain
What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.
Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →
Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly
Side-by-side
| CoreWeave | Oracle | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $49.4B | $431.4B |
| Revenue | $5.1B (FY2025) | $67.4B (FY2026) |
| Primary segment | GPU Clouds (Neoclouds) | Hyperscalers |
| Market position | leader | major |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Tracked suppliers | 9 | 70 |
| Tracked customers | 15 | 3 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 81/100 | 3/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-04. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How CoreWeave and Oracle compare
- Size: Oracle is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Oracle reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: CoreWeave has the higher chokepoint score (81/100 vs 3/100).
- Footprint: CoreWeave (United States) vs Oracle (United States).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “CoreWeave vs Oracle”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/coreweave-vs-oracle (data as of 2026-10-04).
Frequently asked questions3
- Is CoreWeave bigger than Oracle?
- Oracle is larger by market cap ($431.4B vs $49.4B).
- What's the difference between CoreWeave and Oracle?
- CoreWeave is a leader in GPU Clouds (Neoclouds) based in United States; Oracle is a major in Hyperscalers based in United States. Both operate in the AI & Data Center segment.
- Who are CoreWeave's and Oracle's suppliers?
- wafergraph tracks 9 suppliers for CoreWeave and 70 for Oracle — CoreWeave's include NVIDIA, AMD, Hon Hai (Foxconn); Oracle's include NVIDIA, AMD, Ampere Computing.