Corning Incorporated vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics
Corning Incorporated is larger by market cap ($132.9B vs $78.3B). Corning Incorporated reports higher tracked revenue ($15.6B vs $8.3B). Corning Incorporated's primary segment is Photonics & Optics; Samsung Electro-Mechanics's is Substrates.
Shared segment: Materials.
Side-by-side
| Corning Incorporated | Samsung Electro-Mechanics | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $132.9B | $78.3B |
| Revenue | $15.6B (FY2025) | $8.3B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Photonics & Optics | Substrates |
| Market position | leader | major |
| Country | United States | South Korea |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 1 |
| Tracked customers | 1 | 9 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 1/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-05. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Corning Incorporated and Samsung Electro-Mechanics compare
- Size: Corning Incorporated is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Corning Incorporated reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Samsung Electro-Mechanics has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 1/100).
- Footprint: Corning Incorporated (United States) vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics (South Korea).
Company hubs
Corning Incorporated · Samsung Electro-Mechanics · Materials segment
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Corning Incorporated vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/corning-vs-semco (data as of 2026-09-05).