Ferrotec vs Horiba
Horiba is larger by market cap ($6.5B vs $3.0B). Horiba reports higher tracked revenue ($2.1B vs $1.8B). Ferrotec's primary segment is Sputtering Targets; Horiba's is Subsystems & Components.
Shared segment: Equipment (Front End).
Side-by-side
| Ferrotec | Horiba | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.0B | $6.5B |
| Revenue | $1.8B (FY2026) | $2.1B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Sputtering Targets | Subsystems & Components |
| Market position | niche | major |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Tracked suppliers | 2 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 13 | 13 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 53/100 | 71/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-08-12. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Ferrotec and Horiba compare
- Size: Horiba is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Horiba reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Horiba has the higher chokepoint score (71/100 vs 53/100).
- Footprint: Ferrotec (Japan) vs Horiba (Japan).