Ferrotec vs Ultra Clean Holdings
Ultra Clean Holdings is larger by market cap ($3.9B vs $3.0B). Ultra Clean Holdings reports higher tracked revenue ($2.1B vs $1.8B). Ferrotec's primary segment is Sputtering Targets; Ultra Clean Holdings's is Subsystems & Components.
Shared segment: Equipment (Front End).
Side-by-side
| Ferrotec | Ultra Clean Holdings | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.0B | $3.9B |
| Revenue | $1.8B (FY2026) | $2.1B (FY2024) |
| Primary segment | Sputtering Targets | Subsystems & Components |
| Market position | niche | niche |
| Country | Japan | United States |
| Tracked suppliers | 2 | 0 |
| Tracked customers | 13 | 10 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 53/100 | 52/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-08-12. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Ferrotec and Ultra Clean Holdings compare
- Size: Ultra Clean Holdings is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Ultra Clean Holdings reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Ferrotec has the higher chokepoint score (53/100 vs 52/100).
- Footprint: Ferrotec (Japan) vs Ultra Clean Holdings (United States).
Company hubs
Ferrotec · Ultra Clean Holdings · Equipment (Front End) segment