Ferrotec vs Wonik QnC

Ferrotec's primary segment is Sputtering Targets; Wonik QnC's is Subsystems & Components. Ferrotec is larger by market cap ($3.9B vs $640M). Ferrotec reports higher tracked revenue ($1.8B vs $703M).

See all 64 Equipment (Front End) companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

FerrotecWonik QnC
Market cap$3.9B$640M
Revenue$1.8B (FY2026)$703M (FY2025)
Primary segmentSputtering TargetsSubsystems & Components
Market positionnicheniche
CountryJapanSouth Korea
Tracked suppliers20
Tracked customers137
Chokepoint / criticality53/10050/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How Ferrotec and Wonik QnC compare

  • Size: Ferrotec is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: Ferrotec reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Ferrotec has the higher chokepoint score (53/100 vs 50/100).
  • Footprint: Ferrotec (Japan) vs Wonik QnC (South Korea).

Company hubs

Ferrotec · Wonik QnC · Equipment (Front End) segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “Ferrotec vs Wonik QnC”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/ferrotec-vs-wonik_qnc (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is Ferrotec bigger than Wonik QnC?
Ferrotec is larger by market cap ($3.9B vs $640M).
What's the difference between Ferrotec and Wonik QnC?
Ferrotec is a niche in Sputtering Targets based in Japan; Wonik QnC is a niche in Subsystems & Components based in South Korea. Both operate in the Equipment (Front End) segment.
Who are Ferrotec's and Wonik QnC's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 2 suppliers for Ferrotec and 0 for Wonik QnC — Ferrotec's include Heraeus, Tosoh.