HPSP vs NAURA Technology

HPSP's primary segment is Deposition; NAURA Technology's is Etch. NAURA Technology is larger by market cap ($64.5B vs $3.9B). NAURA Technology reports higher tracked revenue ($5.9B vs $129M).

See all 64 Equipment (Front End) companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

HPSPNAURA Technology
Market cap$3.9B$64.5B
Revenue$129M (FY2025)$5.9B (FY2025)
Primary segmentDepositionEtch
Market positionleaderchallenger
CountrySouth KoreaChina
Tracked suppliers00
Tracked customers79
Chokepoint / criticality81/10057/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How HPSP and NAURA Technology compare

  • Size: NAURA Technology is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: NAURA Technology reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: HPSP has the higher chokepoint score (81/100 vs 57/100).
  • Footprint: HPSP (South Korea) vs NAURA Technology (China).

Company hubs

HPSP · NAURA Technology · Equipment (Front End) segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “HPSP vs NAURA Technology”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/hpsp-vs-naura (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is HPSP bigger than NAURA Technology?
NAURA Technology is larger by market cap ($64.5B vs $3.9B).
What's the difference between HPSP and NAURA Technology?
HPSP is a leader in Deposition based in South Korea; NAURA Technology is a challenger in Etch based in China. Both operate in the Equipment (Front End) segment.
Who are HPSP's and NAURA Technology's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for HPSP and 0 for NAURA Technology.