Hut 8 vs Iron Mountain

Both are primarily Data Center Operators (Colo) companies. Iron Mountain is larger by market cap ($33.8B vs $11.1B). Iron Mountain reports higher tracked revenue ($6.9B vs $235M).

Shared segment: AI & Data Center.

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

Hut 8Iron Mountain
Market cap$11.1B$33.8B
Revenue$235M (FY2025)$6.9B (FY2025)
Primary segmentData Center Operators (Colo)Data Center Operators (Colo)
Market positionnichemajor
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
Tracked suppliers44
Tracked customers55
Chokepoint / criticality6/1008/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-04. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How Hut 8 and Iron Mountain compare

  • Size: Iron Mountain is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: Iron Mountain reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Iron Mountain has the higher chokepoint score (8/100 vs 6/100).
  • Footprint: Hut 8 (United States) vs Iron Mountain (United States).

Company hubs

Hut 8 · Iron Mountain · AI & Data Center segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “Hut 8 vs Iron Mountain”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/hut8-vs-iron_mountain (data as of 2026-10-04).

Frequently asked questions3
Is Hut 8 bigger than Iron Mountain?
Iron Mountain is larger by market cap ($33.8B vs $11.1B).
What's the difference between Hut 8 and Iron Mountain?
Hut 8 is a niche in Data Center Operators (Colo) based in United States; Iron Mountain is a major in Data Center Operators (Colo) based in United States. Both operate in the AI & Data Center segment.
Who are Hut 8's and Iron Mountain's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 4 suppliers for Hut 8 and 4 for Iron Mountain.