Kingsemi vs NAURA Technology

Kingsemi's primary segment is Cleaning; NAURA Technology's is Etch. NAURA Technology is larger by market cap ($66.7B vs $9.8B). NAURA Technology reports higher tracked revenue ($5.9B vs $291M).

Shared segment: Equipment (Front End).

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

KingsemiNAURA Technology
Market cap$9.8B$66.7B
Revenue$291M (FY2025)$5.9B (FY2025)
Primary segmentCleaningEtch
Market positionchallengerchallenger
CountryChinaChina
Tracked suppliers00
Tracked customers89
Chokepoint / criticality57/10057/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-04. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How Kingsemi and NAURA Technology compare

  • Size: NAURA Technology is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: NAURA Technology reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Both companies have the same chokepoint score (57/100).
  • Footprint: Kingsemi (China) vs NAURA Technology (China).

Company hubs

Kingsemi · NAURA Technology · Equipment (Front End) segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “Kingsemi vs NAURA Technology”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/kingsemi-vs-naura (data as of 2026-10-04).

Frequently asked questions3
Is Kingsemi bigger than NAURA Technology?
NAURA Technology is larger by market cap ($66.7B vs $9.8B).
What's the difference between Kingsemi and NAURA Technology?
Kingsemi is a challenger in Cleaning based in China; NAURA Technology is a challenger in Etch based in China. Both operate in the Equipment (Front End) segment.
Who are Kingsemi's and NAURA Technology's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for Kingsemi and 0 for NAURA Technology.