Kioxia Holdings vs Samsung Electronics
Samsung Electronics reports higher tracked revenue ($235.3B vs $627M). Kioxia Holdings's primary segment is NAND; Samsung Electronics's is Integrated Device Manufacturer.
Shared segment: Memory.
Side-by-side
| Kioxia Holdings | Samsung Electronics | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Unpriced | Unpriced |
| Revenue | $627M (FY2026) | $235.3B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | NAND | Integrated Device Manufacturer |
| Market position | major | leader |
| Country | Japan | South Korea |
| Tracked suppliers | 4 | 215 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 17 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 81/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-08-12. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Kioxia Holdings and Samsung Electronics compare
- Revenue: Samsung Electronics reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Samsung Electronics has the higher chokepoint score (81/100 vs 68/100).
- Footprint: Kioxia Holdings (Japan) vs Samsung Electronics (South Korea).