Kioxia Holdings vs SK hynix
Kioxia Holdings's primary segment is NAND; SK hynix's is DRAM. SK hynix reports higher tracked revenue ($71.7B vs $634M).
Shared segment: Memory.
Track the chain
What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.
Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →
Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly
Side-by-side
| Kioxia Holdings | SK hynix | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Unpriced | Unpriced |
| Revenue | $634M (FY2026) | $71.7B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | NAND | DRAM |
| Market position | major | leader |
| Country | Japan | South Korea |
| Tracked suppliers | 4 | 170 |
| Tracked customers | 8 | 14 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 81/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-04. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Kioxia Holdings and SK hynix compare
- Revenue: SK hynix reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: SK hynix has the higher chokepoint score (81/100 vs 68/100).
- Footprint: Kioxia Holdings (Japan) vs SK hynix (South Korea).
Company hubs
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Kioxia Holdings vs SK hynix”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/kioxia-vs-sk_hynix (data as of 2026-10-04).
Frequently asked questions3
- Is Kioxia Holdings bigger than SK hynix?
- By tracked revenue, SK hynix is larger ($71.7B vs $634M).
- What's the difference between Kioxia Holdings and SK hynix?
- Kioxia Holdings is a major in NAND based in Japan; SK hynix is a leader in DRAM based in South Korea. Both operate in the Memory segment.
- Who are Kioxia Holdings's and SK hynix's suppliers?
- wafergraph tracks 4 suppliers for Kioxia Holdings and 170 for SK hynix — Kioxia Holdings's include Powertech Technology (PTI), Silicon Motion, Phison Electronics; SK hynix's include Shin-Etsu Chemical, SUMCO, GlobalWafers.