Lam Research vs Piotech

Lam Research's primary segment is Etch; Piotech's is Deposition. Lam Research is larger by market cap ($434.9B vs $27.9B). Lam Research reports higher tracked revenue ($23.2B vs $972M).

Shared segment: Equipment (Front End).

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

Lam ResearchPiotech
Market cap$434.9B$27.9B
Revenue$23.2B (FY2026)$972M (FY2025)
Primary segmentEtchDeposition
Market positionleaderchallenger
CountryUnited StatesChina
Tracked suppliers120
Tracked customers910
Chokepoint / criticality83/10057/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-04. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How Lam Research and Piotech compare

  • Size: Lam Research is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: Lam Research reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Lam Research has the higher chokepoint score (83/100 vs 57/100).
  • Footprint: Lam Research (United States) vs Piotech (China).

Company hubs

Lam Research · Piotech · Equipment (Front End) segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “Lam Research vs Piotech”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/lam_research-vs-piotech (data as of 2026-10-04).

Frequently asked questions3
Is Lam Research bigger than Piotech?
Lam Research is larger by market cap ($434.9B vs $27.9B).
What's the difference between Lam Research and Piotech?
Lam Research is a leader in Etch based in United States; Piotech is a challenger in Deposition based in China. Both operate in the Equipment (Front End) segment.
Who are Lam Research's and Piotech's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 12 suppliers for Lam Research and 0 for Piotech — Lam Research's include Ferrotec, MKS Instruments, Advanced Energy.