Mitsubishi Gas Chemical vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics
Samsung Electro-Mechanics is larger by market cap ($78.3B vs $4.8B). Samsung Electro-Mechanics reports higher tracked revenue ($8.3B vs $2.6B). Mitsubishi Gas Chemical's primary segment is Photoresists & Chemicals; Samsung Electro-Mechanics's is Substrates.
Shared segment: Materials.
Side-by-side
| Mitsubishi Gas Chemical | Samsung Electro-Mechanics | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $4.8B | $78.3B |
| Revenue | $2.6B (FY2026) | $8.3B (FY2025) |
| Primary segment | Photoresists & Chemicals | Substrates |
| Market position | major | major |
| Country | Japan | South Korea |
| Tracked suppliers | 0 | 1 |
| Tracked customers | 7 | 9 |
| Chokepoint / criticality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-09-05. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.
How Mitsubishi Gas Chemical and Samsung Electro-Mechanics compare
- Size: Samsung Electro-Mechanics is the larger company by market cap.
- Revenue: Samsung Electro-Mechanics reports higher tracked revenue.
- Supply-chain criticality: Mitsubishi Gas Chemical has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 68/100).
- Footprint: Mitsubishi Gas Chemical (Japan) vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics (South Korea).
Company hubs
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical · Samsung Electro-Mechanics · Materials segment
Open the interactive comparison tool →
Cite as: wafergraph, “Mitsubishi Gas Chemical vs Samsung Electro-Mechanics”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/mitsubishi_gas-vs-semco (data as of 2026-09-05).