NAURA Technology vs Wonik IPS

NAURA Technology's primary segment is Etch; Wonik IPS's is Deposition. NAURA Technology is larger by market cap ($64.5B vs $4.8B). NAURA Technology reports higher tracked revenue ($5.9B vs $678M).

See all 64 Equipment (Front End) companies →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly

Side-by-side

NAURA TechnologyWonik IPS
Market cap$64.5B$4.8B
Revenue$5.9B (FY2025)$678M (FY2025)
Primary segmentEtchDeposition
Market positionchallengermajor
CountryChinaSouth Korea
Tracked suppliers00
Tracked customers97
Chokepoint / criticality57/10068/100

Market caps/revenue from the wafergraph dataset · data as of 2026-10-09. Criticality is a graph-derived chokepoint score (0–100). Coverage is partial; "Unpriced" means no reliable market cap.

How NAURA Technology and Wonik IPS compare

  • Size: NAURA Technology is the larger company by market cap.
  • Revenue: NAURA Technology reports higher tracked revenue.
  • Supply-chain criticality: Wonik IPS has the higher chokepoint score (68/100 vs 57/100).
  • Footprint: NAURA Technology (China) vs Wonik IPS (South Korea).

Company hubs

NAURA Technology · Wonik IPS · Equipment (Front End) segment

Open the interactive comparison tool →

Cite as: wafergraph, “NAURA Technology vs Wonik IPS”, https://wafergraph.com/compare/naura-vs-wonik_ips (data as of 2026-10-09).

Frequently asked questions3
Is NAURA Technology bigger than Wonik IPS?
NAURA Technology is larger by market cap ($64.5B vs $4.8B).
What's the difference between NAURA Technology and Wonik IPS?
NAURA Technology is a challenger in Etch based in China; Wonik IPS is a major in Deposition based in South Korea. Both operate in the Equipment (Front End) segment.
Who are NAURA Technology's and Wonik IPS's suppliers?
wafergraph tracks 0 suppliers for NAURA Technology and 0 for Wonik IPS.