UNISOC supply chain risk
As of 2026-09-05, UNISOC depends on 4 tracked suppliers headquartered in 2 countries (3 of them in China). 0 of those suppliers hold a monopoly or leader position in their own segment. UNISOC itself carries a supply-chain criticality score of 57/100, with 235 tracked companies downstream of it.
Data as of 2026-09-05 · suppliers are the curated key_supplier edges in the wafergraph dataset (researched or segment-inferred — see /methodology) · criticality is the graph-derived chokepoint score, 0–100
Suppliers by country
- China — 3 suppliers (75%)
- Israel — 1 supplier (25%)
All 4 tracked suppliers
| Supplier | Segment | Position | Country | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMIC | Pure-Play Foundry | major | China | 68/100 |
| JCET Group | Outsourced Assembly & Test | major | China | 68/100 |
| Hua Hong Semiconductor | Pure-Play Foundry | challenger | China | 57/100 |
| Ceva | Semiconductor IP Licensing | niche | Israel | 50/100 |
Downstream exposure
- Criticality score: 57/100
- Companies downstream of UNISOC: 235
- Tracked market cap downstream (priced companies only): $34.69T across 150 priced companies
Cite as: wafergraph, “UNISOC supply chain risk — 4 suppliers, single-source exposure & criticality”, https://wafergraph.com/supply-chain-risk/unisoc (data as of 2026-09-05).
Open UNISOC's supplier graph →
Track the chain
What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.
Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →
Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly