Groq supply chain risk

As of 2026-09-05, Groq depends on 4 tracked suppliers headquartered in 3 countries (2 of them in Taiwan). 3 of those suppliers hold a monopoly or leader position in their own segment, led by TSMC, ASE Technology and Samsung Electronics. Groq itself carries a supply-chain criticality score of 1/100, with 1 tracked companies downstream of it.

Data as of 2026-09-05 · suppliers are the curated key_supplier edges in the wafergraph dataset (researched or segment-inferred — see /methodology) · criticality is the graph-derived chokepoint score, 0–100

Dominant and single-source suppliers

  • TSMC — leader in Pure-Play Foundry, Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • ASE Technology — leader in Outsourced Assembly & Test, Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • Samsung Electronics — leader in Integrated Device Manufacturer, South Korea criticality 81/100

A monopoly or leader supplier is the hardest to replace. These are the edges to watch first.

Suppliers by country

  • Taiwan — 2 suppliers (50%)
  • South Korea — 1 supplier (25%)
  • United States — 1 supplier (25%)

All 4 tracked suppliers

Downstream exposure

  • Criticality score: 1/100
  • Companies downstream of Groq: 1
  • Tracked market cap downstream (priced companies only): $1.57T across 1 priced companies

Cite as: wafergraph, “Groq supply chain risk — 4 suppliers, single-source exposure & criticality”, https://wafergraph.com/supply-chain-risk/groq (data as of 2026-09-05).

Open Groq's supplier graph →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly