Mythic supply chain risk
As of 2026-09-05, Mythic depends on 3 tracked suppliers headquartered in 2 countries (2 of them in Taiwan). 2 of those suppliers hold a monopoly or leader position in their own segment, led by TSMC and ASE Technology. The dataset records no companies downstream of Mythic: it sits at the demand end of the chain, so the risk here runs upstream only.
Data as of 2026-09-05 · suppliers are the curated key_supplier edges in the wafergraph dataset (researched or segment-inferred — see /methodology) · criticality is the graph-derived chokepoint score, 0–100
Dominant and single-source suppliers
- TSMC — leader in Pure-Play Foundry, Taiwan
- ASE Technology — leader in Outsourced Assembly & Test, Taiwan
A monopoly or leader supplier is the hardest to replace. These are the edges to watch first.
Suppliers by country
- Taiwan — 2 suppliers (67%)
- United States — 1 supplier (33%)
All 3 tracked suppliers
| Supplier | Segment | Position | Country | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSMC | Pure-Play Foundry | leader | Taiwan | 81/100 |
| ASE Technology | Outsourced Assembly & Test | leader | Taiwan | 81/100 |
| GlobalFoundries | Pure-Play Foundry | major | United States | 68/100 |
Downstream exposure
- Criticality score: 0/100
- Companies downstream of Mythic: 0
Cite as: wafergraph, “Mythic supply chain risk — 3 suppliers, single-source exposure & criticality”, https://wafergraph.com/supply-chain-risk/mythic (data as of 2026-09-05).
Open Mythic's supplier graph →
Track the chain
What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.
Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →
Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly