NVIDIA supply chain risk

As of 2026-09-05, NVIDIA depends on 104 tracked suppliers headquartered in 16 countries (34 of them in the United States). 20 of those suppliers hold a monopoly or leader position in their own segment, led by TSMC, Arm Holdings and Advantest. NVIDIA itself carries a supply-chain criticality score of 81/100, with 235 tracked companies downstream of it.

Data as of 2026-09-05 · suppliers are the curated key_supplier edges in the wafergraph dataset (researched or segment-inferred — see /methodology) · criticality is the graph-derived chokepoint score, 0–100

Dominant and single-source suppliers

  • TSMC — leader in Pure-Play Foundry, Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • Arm Holdings — leader in Semiconductor IP Licensing, United Kingdom criticality 81/100
  • Advantest — leader in Test Equipment, Japan criticality 82/100
  • InnoLight Technology — leader in Photonics & Optics, China criticality 81/100
  • ASE Technology — leader in Outsourced Assembly & Test, Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • Cadence Design Systems — leader in EDA Software, United States criticality 82/100
  • Synopsys — leader in EDA Software, United States criticality 82/100
  • Teradyne — leader in Test Equipment, United States criticality 81/100
  • Unimicron — leader in Substrates, Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • Ibiden — leader in Substrates, Japan criticality 81/100
  • ASPEED Technology — leader in Edge & IoT SoC, Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • Technoprobe — leader in Probe Cards, Italy criticality 81/100
  • SiTime — leader in Analog & Mixed Signal, United States criticality 81/100
  • eMemory Technology — leader in Semiconductor IP Licensing, Taiwan criticality 81/100
  • Innoscience — leader in Integrated Device Manufacturer, China criticality 81/100
  • Hamamatsu Photonics — leader in Photonics & Optics, Japan criticality 81/100
  • CoolIT Systems Inc. — leader in Power & Cooling, Canada criticality 81/100
  • Samsung Electronics — leader in Integrated Device Manufacturer, South Korea criticality 81/100
  • SK hynix — leader in DRAM, South Korea criticality 81/100
  • Win Semiconductors — leader in Pure-Play Foundry, Taiwan criticality 81/100

A monopoly or leader supplier is the hardest to replace. These are the edges to watch first.

Suppliers by country

  • United States — 34 suppliers (33%)
  • Taiwan — 22 suppliers (21%)
  • China — 15 suppliers (14%)
  • South Korea — 8 suppliers (8%)
  • Japan — 7 suppliers (7%)
  • United Kingdom — 4 suppliers (4%)
  • Canada — 3 suppliers (3%)
  • Germany — 2 suppliers (2%)
  • Israel — 2 suppliers (2%)
  • Italy — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Finland — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Thailand — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Malaysia — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Czech Republic — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Spain — 1 supplier (1%)
  • Singapore — 1 supplier (1%)

All 104 tracked suppliers

Downstream exposure

  • Criticality score: 81/100
  • Companies downstream of NVIDIA: 235
  • Tracked market cap downstream (priced companies only): $29.12T across 149 priced companies

Cite as: wafergraph, “NVIDIA supply chain risk — 104 suppliers, single-source exposure & criticality”, https://wafergraph.com/supply-chain-risk/nvidia (data as of 2026-09-05).

Open NVIDIA's supplier graph →

Track the chain

What moved in the semiconductor supply chain — This Week in the Chain, the free weekly wafergraph briefing.

Subscribe to the free weekly briefing →

Free · no login · 615 companies, updated weekly